Brand Safety Across Programmatic Buying.

As programmatic advertising continues to dominate digital media buying across all channels, the promise of efficiency and scale is matched by the challenge of ensuring brand safety. Automated transactions across millions of websites, apps (including social walled gardens), and streaming platforms create significant risks for advertisers if their messages appear alongside inappropriate, harmful, or fraudulent content.

Defining Brand Safety in Programmatic

Brand safety refers to the processes and technologies used to prevent ads from appearing in environments that could harm a brand’s reputation—common concerns include adjacency to violent or extremist content, misinformation, adult material, or other categories that are broadly deemed unsuitable.

In practice, ensuring brand safety is complex in programmatic channels. Real-time bidding leaves little opportunity for manual oversight, requiring advertisers to rely on third-party verification partners to monitor placements and enforce controls.

IAS and DoubleVerify: Industry Verification Leaders

Both IAS and DoubleVerify provide verification, measurement, and safety/suitability services, with key capabilities including:

  • Brand Safety and Suitability: Automated classification of digital content, allowing advertisers to block placements that conflict with brand requirements.

  • Fraud Detection: Identification of invalid traffic (IVT), such as bot activity or manipulated impressions.

  • Viewability Measurement: Ensures ads are actually seen by real users.

  • Contextual Targeting: Helps advertisers align with content that complements their brand, moving beyond a defensive posture into proactive placement strategies.

From Brand Safety to Brand Suitability

The industry is also shifting toward a more nuanced concept: brand suitability. Rather than simply avoiding harmful environments, advertisers are seeking contextual alignment with content that fits their brand values and audience. For instance, a sports apparel company may find opportunities within combat sports, a category that other brands may want to avoid.

Both IAS and DoubleVerify have adapted their offerings to reflect this trend, providing granular controls and reporting that allow brands to balance reach with contextual relevance.

Why It MatterS

In programmatic environments—where real-time bidding (RTB) transactions happen in milliseconds, across millions of publishers and content types—manual oversight isn’t sufficient. Brands have to lean on third-party verification partners to define rules, classify content, monitor compliance, and provide transparency.

For advertisers, brand safety and suitability directly impact consumer trust, campaign efficiency, and ultimately, ROI. Verification partners like IAS and DoubleVerify act as independent watchdogs in a fragmented programmatic ecosystem, offering assurance that impressions are delivered in safe, transparent, and performance-driven environments.

FULL TRANSPARENCY AT CRATE

Leveraging third-party verification tools is our standard methodology of ad buying at CRATE. As technology has expanded from Display to Social (META, TikTok, YouTube, X) and now includes Connected TV, our campaign architect experience ensures our clients are already one step ahead of their competitors.

Brands must ensure not just that their ads don’t appear next to harmful content, but that they do appear in environments that enhance relevance, trust, and performance.

Let’s have a chat and ensure your ads are in brand-safe environments only.

Previous
Previous

The Rise of Reddit in Search Marketing

Next
Next

Programmatic buying across CTV: The Time Is Now.